When Britain refused entry visas to two Belarusian players at CSKA Sofia, it gave an administrative advantage to their opponents before a ball was kicked. Football's governing bodies have so far said nothing about it.
What happened
According to 24 Chasa, the United Kingdom denied visas to CSKA Sofia players Fyodor Lapoukhov and Max Ebong, both Belarusian nationals, ahead of the club's Europa Conference League qualifying match against Derry City in Northern Ireland. Both players were regular starters. CSKA travelled without them and won the away leg 3-2, but the visa refusals meant the tie was played under unequal conditions.
The argument put forward in an opinion piece circulating on social media and picked up by 24 Chasa is direct: a government's administrative decision shaped the squad composition of one team in a sanctioned UEFA competition. That, the piece argues, is political interference in sport.
The absence of a response from UEFA and FIFA
UEFA and FIFA both have regulations requiring that member associations and host countries facilitate the entry of registered players for official competitions. Visa denials on political grounds have caused problems across international sport, from tennis to rugby, but football's governing bodies have rarely issued public rebukes when a NATO-aligned country is involved.
24 Chasa reports that critics are drawing a comparison to another recent controversy: the suspension of a red-card ban for a United States player during the FIFA World Cup, which many observers saw as governing bodies yielding to political and commercial pressure. Both episodes raise a question about whether UEFA and FIFA can credibly claim to protect fair competition.



